Dirty LibbyRichard BradleyNovember 17, 2005Richard Bradley is the former executive editor of George magazine. He is author of American Son: A Portrait of John F. Kennedy, Jr., and Harvard Rules: The Struggle for the Soul of the World's Most Powerful University. I don’t normally associate bestiality with Republicans, but in Scooter Libby’s case, one has to make an exception. Consider this excerpt from Libby’s 1996 novel, The Apprentice, which chronicles the depraved training of a Japanese prostitute:
This is a curious passage, and not just because of the less-than-obvious connection between milky-white skin and sex with a bear. It’s strange because the author is a conservative Republican, a member (well, until recently) of an administration which considers sex—even sex between two humans—a bad, bad thing. John Ashcroft, for example, clothed a statue’s bare breast; the FCC tried to cover up Janet Jackson’s; and two months ago, the FBI launched an anti-obscenity squad. (Would Scooter Libby’s book fit the bill?) So the fact that Dick Cheney’s closest confidante scripted a work featuring bestiality, rape and general licentiousness would seem to constitute hypocrisy in the GOP’s war against immorality—lashing out against others’ smut and sin while profiting off them yourself. But then, it’s hardly the only such example. Here are a few more.
The list could go on (Strom Thurmond, anyone?), but as fun and titillating as that would be, there is a larger point here. The GOP bills itself as the party of family values, and in a hundred different ways imposes its moralistic judgments about sex and reproduction on the American people. It tries to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage; it subverts the FDA’s science to ban the morning-after pill; it attaches anti-birth control restrictions to foreign aid. Etcetera. And all the while the party’s most powerful members live by a double-standard of personal vice and ill-gotten gain. Of course, hypocrisy on the part of individuals doesn’t entirely negate a morality platform. But at the least, it does suggest that some of the most powerful proponents of “family values” are deeply cynical about that aspect of the Republican agenda. They feel free to impose these values on others even while making a mockery of them in their own lives. Moreover, in this coming campaign year there’s an opportunity for Democrats here—not to excoriate Republicans for their personal failings, which is a dangerous game, but to remind Americans that government isn’t suited to the promotion of sexual morality upon its citizens. That’s really the work of community groups, churches, schools and other grassroots organizations. Instead, citizens should demand morality in government—e.g., sending the nation into war as a last resort and on the basis of sound intelligence; protecting the identities of CIA agents; promoting high-quality public broadcasting free from partisan influence; awarding federal contracts competitively with no favoritism shown for administration officials’ former companies. Government shouldn’t dictate morality to citizens, but citizens should expect morality in government. It’s the kind of thing that Republicans used to say. That they no longer do provides an opening for Democrats to make their case. |