Flying Blind

 

The Project on Government Oversight investigates, exposes, and seeks to remedy systemic abuses of power, mismanagement and subservience by the federal government to powerful special interests.

Editor’s note: The Project on Government Oversight is a respected Washington-based watchdog group that works with government whistleblowers. What follows is its announcement of uncovering an e-mail sent between senior military special operations staffers in April of 2001. That spring, officials at the North American Aerospace Defense Command wanted to include in annual training exercises a scenario in which terrorists hijacked a commercial airliner and intended on flying it into a building. The Joint Chiefs of Staff rejected that suggestion, saying it was an unlikely scenario.

According to an e-mail obtained by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), members of the U.S. military responsible for defending America's airspace were in fact concerned that a terrorist group would "hijack a commercial airline [sic] (foreign carrier) and fly it into the Pentagon."

Officials at the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) in April 2001"five months prior to 9/11"wanted to develop a response in the event that a terrorist group would use an airliner as a missile to attack the Pentagon, but the Joint Chiefs of Staff rejected the scenario as "too unrealistic." NORAD's mission is to "deter, detect, and defend" U.S. and Canadian airspace.

National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice told the 9/11 Commission in her April 8 testimony that an August 2001 presidential briefing memo that was recently declassified did not contain specific threat information. "And it did not raise the possibility that terrorists might use airplanes as missiles," she testified.

However, Rice hedged when asked directly whether she ever saw or heard any memos or discussions from the FBI, CIA or any other intelligence agencies that talked about using planes as bombs. She said she had not, but also added, "I cannot tell you that there might not have been a report here or a report there that reached somebody in our midst."

"We believe the 9/11 Commission should ask the Joint Chiefs why they prevented NORAD from training to respond to the possibility that terrorists might hijack commercial airliners and use them as missiles," said POGO's Senior Investigator Peter Stockton.

POGO has learned that this scenario was being suggested by Special Operations personnel who are trained to think like terrorists. These highly trained military units have repeatedly warned that U.S. nuclear facilities are also inadequately protected against terrorist attacks. "Maybe the 9/11 Commission should talk to these special operations experts," Stockton said.

Click here to subscribe to our free e-mail dispatch and get the latest on what's new at TomPaine.com before everyone else! You can unsubscribe at any time and we will never distribute your information to any other entity.

Published: Apr 13 2004